THE OHIO VALLEY-GREAT LAKES ETHNOHISTORY
ARCHIVES: THE MIAMI COLLECTION
It is noted that the following work from the Miami Archives should be read and
considered within the historical context in which it was composed and printed.
The opinions expressed and the language used do not reflect the opinions or
standards of the Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, but are, rather,
indicative of thought in that historical moment during which the document was
published.
(1755)
In: Affaires Etrangeres, Corr. Pol.: Angleterre,
438:139 and in Pease, French Series,
vol. II, 1936, pp. 164-177.
. . . In this treaty [Utrecht] there has never been question of the territory of the Indians because they have neither limits nor boundaries and change their habitations according to their caprice. The English can derive no right in this respect from what is found in the treaty under the vague designation of the Five Nations. It is but a simple enumeration which cannot be decisive as to the status of these tribes, which are very far from admitting English sovereignty. This enumeration is even more indecisive for establishing our possessions, at least as implying that wherever one of those Indians has set his foot, he has taken the propriety from us and given it to the English.
Return
to TOC, p. 13
Continue
to next part of Miami Collection
[return to Miami
Collection Menu]
[return to Glenn A. Black
Laboratory of Archaeology List of Publications]
[return to Glenn A. Black
Laboratory of Archaeology Home]
Last updated: 05
December 2000
URL: http://www.gbl.indiana.edu/home.html
Comments: webmaster@www.gbl.indiana.edu
Copyright 1996, Glenn Black Laboratory of Archaeology and The Trustees of Indiana University