THE OHIO VALLEY-GREAT LAKES ETHNOHISTORY
ARCHIVES: THE MIAMI COLLECTION
It is noted that the following work from the Miami Archives should be read and
considered within the historical context in which it was composed and printed.
The opinions expressed and the language used do not reflect the opinions or
standards of the Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, but are, rather,
indicative of thought in that historical moment during which the document was
published.
(Sept. 9, 1761)
In: Affaires Etrangeres, Cor.
Pol.:
Angleterre, 444:266- extract
and in Pease, French
Series, vol. II, 1936,
pp. 393-396.
Article 2
The first paragraph on the boundaries of Louisiana contained in article 2 of the English reply is accorded by France. The second paragraph is neither clear nor exact, and in last resort it is proposed that it be worded as follows:
The intermediate Indian tribes between the lakes and the Mississippi within the line shall be neutral and independent under the king's protection;' and those outside the line on the English side shall likewise be neutral and independent under the protection of the King of England. The English traders shall also be forbidden to go among the Indian tribes beyond the line on either (page 396) side; but the said tribes shall not be hindered in freedom of trade with the French and English carried on at present.
Return
to TOC, p. 15
Continue
to next part of Miami Collection
[return to Miami
Collection Menu]
[return to Glenn A. Black
Laboratory of Archaeology List of Publications]
[return to Glenn A. Black
Laboratory of Archaeology Home]
Last updated: 12
December 2000
URL: http://www.gbl.indiana.edu/home.html
Comments: webmaster@www.gbl.indiana.edu
Copyright 1996, Glenn Black Laboratory of Archaeology and The Trustees of Indiana University